Re: Additional virtio-mmio spec changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:01:39 +0000, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
> 
> Peter (on Cc) got the qemu implementation up and running (thanks!) and
> provided some useful feedback regarding the spec. To make the long story
> short, this is what came out of the discussion (feel free to correct me
> at any point, Peter ;-):

OK, I applied them manually.  One of the pains of using LyX is that you
need to turn change tracking on before making changes (I really like to
produce change-tracking versions of new spec releases).

> Of course those changes are not critical so can easily wait till the
> next release. Peter also mentioned that he didn't like the "Num" in
> "QueueNum" register name and would rather see it called "QueueSize". I
> have no strong opinions either way and can provide patches to both the
> spec and the driver (and header) to change it. Any thoughts?

Num isn't great, but Size might be misleading.  I'd leave it...

Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux