Re: [PATCH 086/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Leverage the spinlock to manage ref_cnt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:58:36AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 7:10 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 086/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Leverage the spinlock to
> > manage ref_cnt
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47:14AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Now that we have a spin lock protecting access to the stor device pointer,
> > > use it manage the reference count as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h |    8 ++++----
> > >  drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c        |   10 +++++-----
> > >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h
> > b/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h
> > > index 53b65be..d946211 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h
> > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ struct storvsc_device {
> > >  	struct hv_device *device;
> > >
> > >  	/* 0 indicates the device is being destroyed */
> > > -	atomic_t ref_count;
> > > +	int	 ref_count;
> > 
> > Is this really needed?  Can't you rely on the reference count of the
> > hv_device itself?
> 
> We don't have a reference count on the hv_device

Wait, why not?  You shure better have a reference count on that device
if you have a pointer to it, if not, you have a bug, and that needs to
be fixed.  Please reread Documentation/CodingStyle for details.

> and this count is taken to deal with racing unloads and incoming
> traffic on the channel from the host. 

Is this something that all other storage drivers have to do?  If not,
then you shouldn't be doing that as well.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux