On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:57:32 +0300, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 12:23 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:51:01 +0300, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The MAC of a virtio-net device is located at the first field of the device > > > specific header. This header is located at offset 20 if the device doesn't > > > support MSI-X or offset 24 if it does. > > > > Erk. This means, in general, we have to do virtio_find_single_vq or > > config->find_vqs before we examine any config options. > > > > Look at virtio_blk, which has the same error. > > > > Solutions in order of best to worst: > > (1) Enable MSI-X before calling device probe. This means reserving two > > vectors in virtio_pci_probe to ensure we *can* do this, I think. Michael? > > Do you mean reserving the vectors even before we probed the device for > MSI-X support? Wouldn't we need 3 vectors then? (config, input, output). We want three, but *need* two: see vp_find_vqs(). Also, the generic code doesn't know how many virtqueues we have on the device. > > (2) Ensure ordering of "find_vqs then access config space" statically. This > > probably means handing the vqs array to virtio_config_val, so noone > > can call it before they have their virtqueues. > > Just noticed that only virtio-blk uses virtio_config_val(), while the > others are still doing 'if(virtio_has_feature()) vdev->config->get()', > I'll send patches to fix that regardless of what we end up doing here. Thanks. > Did you want to pass the vq array to virtio_config_val() just to check > that they were already found? Not if we fix is using method #1... Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
