On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/03/2011 06:59 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:53:22AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:31:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>>> This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. >>>>> >>>>> - Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. >>>>> - Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. >>>>> - Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). >>>>> - Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. It will >>>>> make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) >>>> Hm, you seemed to have the x86 maintainers on your email.. >>> I definitly need some coffee. What I meant was that you missing putting >>> the x86 maintainers on this patchset. They are the ones that will handle this. >>> >>> I put them on the To list for you. >> Are you sure about that coffee? I'm pretty sure I had x86@xxxxxxxxxx in there. > > What's the state of this series? Has tip.git picked it up, or does it > need another go-around? > > I just booted a Linus tree and got a backtrace that looks like this > issue, though I haven't looked into it in detail yet. It's in tip/x86/vdso. I don't know it's status on the way from there to -linus. --Andy _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
