Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] virtio_net: refill buffer right after being used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Shirley Ma <mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Resubmit it with a typo fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 0c7321c..c8201d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,22 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>        return err;
>  }
>
> +static int fill_one(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> +               err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
> +       else if (vi->big_packets)
> +               err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
> +       else
> +               err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
> +
> +       if (err >= 0)
> +               ++vi->num;
> +       return err;
> +}
> +
>  /* Returns false if we couldn't fill entirely (OOM). */
>  static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> @@ -436,17 +452,10 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp)
>        bool oom;
>
>        do {
> -               if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_mergeable(vi, gfp);
> -               else if (vi->big_packets)
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_big(vi, gfp);
> -               else
> -                       err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, gfp);
> -
> +               err = fill_one(vi, gfp);
>                oom = err == -ENOMEM;
>                if (err < 0)
>                        break;
> -               ++vi->num;
>        } while (err > 0);
>        if (unlikely(vi->num > vi->max))
>                vi->max = vi->num;
> @@ -506,13 +515,13 @@ again:
>                receive_buf(vi->dev, buf, len);
>                --vi->num;
>                received++;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
> -               if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +               if (fill_one(vi, GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
>                        schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>        }
>
> +       /* notify buffers are refilled */
> +       virtqueue_kick(vi->rvq);
> +

How does this reduce latency?   We are doing the same amount of work
in both cases, and in both cases the newly available buffers are not
visible to the device until the virtqueue_kick..


>        /* Out of packets? */
>        if (received < budget) {
>                napi_complete(napi);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux