On Sunday, June 19, 2011 05:27:00 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > OK, different people seem to test different trees. In the hope to get > everyone on the same page, I created several variants of this patch so > they can be compared. Whoever's interested, please check out the > following, and tell me how these compare: I'm in the process of testing these patches. Base and v0 are complete and v1 is near complete with v2 to follow. I'm testing with a variety of TCP_RR and TCP_STREAM/TCP_MAERTS tests involving local guest-to-guest tests and remote host-to-guest tests. I'll post the results in the next day or two when the tests finish. Thanks, Tom > > kernel: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git > > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/base - this is net-next baseline to test > against virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v0 - fixes checks on out of capacity > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v1 - previous revision of the patch > this does xmit,free,xmit,2*free,free > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v2 - new revision of the patch > this does free,xmit,2*free,free > > There's also this on top: > virtio-net-limit-xmit-polling/v3 -> don't delay avail index update > I don't think it's important to test this one, yet > > Userspace to use: event index work is not yet merged upstream > so the revision to use is still this: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu-kvm.git > virtio-net-event-idx-v3 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
