On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:59:27 +0200, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06/09/2011 01:28 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> > after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a >> >> > draft specification for a virtio-based SCSI host (controller, HBA, you >> >> > name it). >> > >> > OK, I'm impressed. This is very well written and it doesn't make any of >> > the obvious mistakes wrt. virtio. >> >> Thanks very much, and thanks to those who corrected my early mistakes. >> >> > I assume you have an implementation, as well? >> >> Unfortunately not; "we're working on it", which means I should start in >> July when I come back from vacation. >> >> Do you prefer to wait for one before I make a patch to the LyX source? >> In the meanwhile, can you reserve a subsystem ID for me? >> >> Paolo > > Sure, you can have the next subsystem ID. > > It's a pain to patch once it's in LyX, so let's get the implementation > base on what you posted here an see how much it changes first... Paolo, I'll switch the Linux guest LLD and QEMU virtio-scsi skeleton that I have to comply with the spec. Does this sound good or did you want to write these from scratch? Stefan _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
