Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused wrapper - vmbus_onchannel_event()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:59:32PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:15 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang;
> > Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused wrapper -
> > vmbus_onchannel_event()
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:49:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Now, get rid of the unused wrapper - vmbus_onchannel_event().
> > 
> > I'd merge this into the previous patch.  In general your patch split
> > seem a little too fine grained to me in general.  When you remove a
> > wrapper you can inline it into the callsite directly, if you clean up a
> > function directly inlining it into the helper is fine, etc.
> > 
> I agree with you that some of these patches are too fine grained; but 
> I thought that was what was expected - "one change per patch".

Yes, but don't take it to an extreme, like you have done here :)

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux