On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:34:26PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40? > > > virtio:event_index_interface.patch > > > virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch > > > virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch > > > misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch > > > virtio:test_support_event_index.patch > > > virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch > > > virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch > > > > > > I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes > > > testing them out of tree hard for people. > > > Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch > > > qemu and get more people to try out the patches. > > > > > > Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ... > > > > Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the > > third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday. > > > > Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus > > closes the merge window. > > > > I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to > > have a second implementation. > > > > Cheers, > > Rusty. > > Couldn't find any pull requests at lkml, and I read the window will > likely close May 29. Did you end up not sending it, or did I miss it? Pls ignore, problem at my end. Thanks, and sorry about the noise. > -- > MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
