On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40? > > virtio:event_index_interface.patch > > virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch > > virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch > > misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch > > virtio:test_support_event_index.patch > > virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch > > virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch > > > > I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes > > testing them out of tree hard for people. > > Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch > > qemu and get more people to try out the patches. > > > > Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ... > > Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the > third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday. > > Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus > closes the merge window. I see, there are for-linus tags in the series file, this is what got me worried. > I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to > have a second implementation. > > Cheers, > Rusty. Absolutely. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
