On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:54:02AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > After that, do you want another round of review of the code, or do > > you have more things you want to send in (like the name[64] removal?) > > I would prefer that we go through the review process. What is the process for > this review? The same as always, just ask. > Is there a time window for people to respond. No. We don't have time limits here, this is a community, we don't have deadlines, you know that. > I am hoping I will be able to address all the review comments well in > advance of the next closing of the tree, with the hope of taking the > vmbus driver out of staging this go around (hope springs eternal in > the human breast ...)! Yes, it would be nice, and I understand your the corporate pressures you are under to get this done, and I am doing my best to fit the patch review and apply cycle into my very-very-limited-at-the-moment spare time. As always, if you miss this kernel release, there's always another one 3 months away, so it's no big deal in the long-run. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
