On (Thu) 14 Apr 2011 [13:28:17], Dave Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 22:13 +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Tue) 12 Apr 2011 [09:22:32], Dave Hansen wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 11:13 +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > > > Sure, the only contention was on the commit message, where you stated > > > > modern qemus set this... qemu doesn't, and it should. Care to do a > > > > patch for that? > > > > > > If Rusty hasn't pushed the commit out anywhere, we can still amend the > > > commit. Otherwise, we're in a _bit_ of a pickle since you can't patch > > > git logs. :) > > > > I should've been clearer: care to do the qemu patch? :-) > > What do we want to do to qemu, though? Set the bit? Yes, that should ensure older guests behave fine too. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
