>>> On 08.04.11 at 17:25, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/07/2011 11:38 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Is there any downside to this patch (is X86_CMPXCHG in the same sort of >> boat?) > > Only if we don't use cmpxchg in shared memory with other domains or the > hypervisor. (I don't think it will dynamically switch between real and > emulated cmpxchg depending on availability.) Actually it does - see the "#ifndef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" section in asm/cmpxchg_32.h. Jan _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
