On 04/06/2011 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I'm not sure why ELAN belongs in the EXTENDED_PLATFORM option space > rather than in the CPU choice option, since its only impact seems to be > on -march, MODULE_PROC_FAMILY and some cpufreq drivers which doesn't > sound like an extended platform to me but does it appear to be > deliberate (see 9e111f3e167a "x86: move ELAN to the > NON_STANDARD_PLATFORM section", that was the old name for > EXTENDED_PLATFORM). > Historic... we used to have nonstandard A20M# handling on Elan, until it was discovered that we could make it work without it. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization