Re: [PATCH] virtio: decrement dev_index when device is unregistered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Takuma Umeya <tumeya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When virtio device is removed, dev_index does not get decremented.
> The next device hotplug event results in consuming the next pci to
> the one that is suppose to be available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> index efb35aa..67fe71d 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_virtio_device);
>  void unregister_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
>  {
>        device_unregister(&dev->dev);
> +       dev_index--;

I don't think there is any guarantee that virtio devices are
added/removed in first-in-last-out order.

That means I could add a virtio-net device (index 0) followed by a
virtio-blk device (index 1).  Now I remove the virtio-net device
(index 0) which causes me to decrement dev_index and hand index 1 out
again to the next device.  This leaves us with virtio-blk (index 1)
and the new device with index 1, which is not unique.

Perhaps I missed a constraint which prevents this from occurring?

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux