Re: [PATCH 1/6] Staging: hv: Unify hyper-v device abstractions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:13:34PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 10:21 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan; r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang; Hank
> > Janssen
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Staging: hv: Unify hyper-v device abstractions
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Just an FYI,
> > 
> > When sending out patch series, could you send out a [PATCH 0/6] first,
> > and have all other patches a reply to that patch. Both git and quilt
> > have ways to do this.
> 
> My mistake; I numbered the patches 1 through 6 as opposed to 0 through 5.
> Sorry for the confusion.

Wait, what?

So, what should I apply here, only patches 2-6?  What is patch 1 for
then?

still totally confused,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux