Re: [PATCH] change acquire/release_console_sem() to console_lock/unlock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Torben Hohn wrote:
> the -rt patches change the console_semaphore to console_mutex.
> so a quite large chunk of the patches changes all
> acquire/release_console_sem() to acquire/release_console_mutex()

Why not just change the functionality of the existing function to be a
mutex in the rt patches, instead of having to rename it everywhere?

> this commit makes things use more neutral function names
> which dont make implications about the underlying lock.
> 
> the only real change is the return value of console_trylock
> which is inverted from try_acquire_console_sem()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Torben Hohn <torbenh@xxxxxx>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxx>

I don't mind this rename, but is it really going to help anything out?
What's the odds of the -rt portion of this patch ever making it to
mainline?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux