Re: [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:07:13 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I visited existing smp_send_reschedule() implementations and tried to
> add a call to scheduler_ipi() in their handler part, but esp. for MIPS
> I'm not quite sure I actually got all of them.
>  
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> index 94cf510..61789e8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -163,12 +163,12 @@ static void do_ext_call_interrupt(unsigned int ext_int_code,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * handle bit signal external calls
> -	 *
> -	 * For the ec_schedule signal we have to do nothing. All the work
> -	 * is done automatically when we return from the interrupt.
>  	 */
>  	bits = xchg(&S390_lowcore.ext_call_fast, 0);
>  
> +	if (test_bit(ec_schedule, &bits))
> +		scheduler_ipi();
> +
>  	if (test_bit(ec_call_function, &bits))
>  		generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
>  

s390 bits are fine.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux