Re: Using virtio as a physical (wire-level) transport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 07:34:19AM -0400, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I'd vote for defining virtio v2 that makes everything LE. Maybe we
> could even have an LE capability with a grace period of phasing out
> non-LE capable hosts and guests.

So there are multiple ideas floating for modifying the ring,
and together they might warrant virtio2.
This includes removing available ring, publishing consumer indexes,
possibly some interrupt mitigation ideas, and we can put
endian-ness there.

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux