Re: [PATCH 1/2] S390: take a full byte as ext_param indicator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 08/24/2010 03:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>> I have no strong opinion on that, but I think its more a matter of where
>> to put an interface description. A header file seems just the right
>> place.
>> I will let you (or Rusty) decide.
>
> First of all we need a virtio/s390 specification, like we have a
> virtio/pci spec.

Sure, go ahead and write one :). All the bits are open.
No seriously, I've wanted to write one for quite a while but this is not
the right patch set for this.

> Second, I agree it should be in an exported header file, even if qemu
> doesn't make use of it.  It's an interface and should be exported.

Hrm. *shrug* if you think it makes sense. I'm reasonably indifferent
either way, but I don't see value-add in it.


Alex

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux