From: Pankaj Thakkar <pthakkar@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:18:22 -0700 > The plugin is guest agnostic and hence we did not want to rely on > any kernel provided functions. While I disagree entirely with this kind of approach, even that doesn't justify what you're doing here. memcpy() and memset() are on a much more fundamental ground than "kernel provided functions". They had better be available no matter where you build this thing. And doing what you're doing is foolish on so many levels. One more duplication of code, one more place for unnecessary bugs to live, one more place that might need optimizations and thus require duplication of even more work people have done over the years. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
