RE: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Fix race condition on IC channel initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxx]
> > +/* Counter of IC channels initialized */
> > +atomic_t hv_utils_initcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> 
> This doesn't need to be an atomic variable, does it really?
> 
> Why not have a simple bool variable "vmbus_initialized" or something.
> It starts out as false, and then turns true when you are up and ready.
> Then provide a function that tests it:
> 	bool hv_vmbus_ready(void)
> 	{
> 		return vmbus_initialized
> 	}
> 	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_vmbus_ready);
> 
> 
> this turns into a simple function call, again, never needing to know
> about message types or any other mess.

This looks good. I will add the hv_vmbus_ready() function. It doesn't even 
have to be exported symbol, because it's only used in vmbus module to ensure 
all channels are ready before vmbus_init() returns. Other modules won't get a 
chance to see uninitialized channels after hv_vmbus is loaded.

Also, I'll cleanup the printk in hv_utils load/unload.

Regarding the atomic variable -- the channel offer processing function is 
triggered by interrupts from host -- should we be concerned about "counter++" 
racing with each other in two interrupts happening around the same time?

Thanks,

- Haiyang

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux