Re: [PATCH] vhost: Storage class should be before const qualifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:12:49PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>


Will apply, thanks!
Just to clarify: does some compiler/checker actually barf on this?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/net.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index aa88911..cd36f5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static long vhost_net_compat_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -const static struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
> +static const struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
>  	.owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>  	.release        = vhost_net_release,
>  	.unlocked_ioctl = vhost_net_ioctl,
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux