Re: question on virtio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:40:15PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/05/2010 06:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I see this in virtio_ring.c:
>>
>>          /* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx *
>> 	   until they do sync). */
>>
>> Why is it done this way?
>> It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while
>> this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle
>> it, without waiting for the kick.
>>    
>
> It should be okay as long as you don't update idx for partial vectors.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

Sorry, what do you mean by partial vectors here?
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux