"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 03/02/2010 11:54:32 PM:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:20:03PM -0800, David Stevens wrote:
> > These patches add support for mergeable receive buffers to
> > vhost-net, allowing it to use multiple virtio buffer heads for a
single
> > receive packet.
> > +-DLS
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Do you have performance numbers (both with and without mergeable buffers
> in guest)?
Michael,
Nothing formal. I did some TCP single-stream throughput tests
and was seeing 20-25% improvement on a laptop (ie, low-end hardware).
That actually surprised me; I'd think it'd be about the same, except
maybe in a test that has mixed packet sizes. Comparisons with the
net-next kernel these patches are for showed only ~10% improvement.
But I also see a lot of variability both among different
configurations and with the same configuration on different runs.
So, I don't feel like those numbers are very solid, and I haven't
yet done any tests on bigger hardware.
2 notes: I have a modified version of qemu to get the VHOST_FEATURES
flags, including the mergeable RX bufs flag, passed to the guest; I'll
be working with your current qemu git trees next, if any changes are
needed to support it there.
Second, I've found a missing initialization in the patches I
sent on the list, so I'll send an updated patch 2 with the fix, and
qemu patches when they are ready (plus any code-review comments
incorporated).
+-DLS
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
