Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. > Rusty, I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and > hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? I think the benchmark data is a prerequisite for merge consideration, IMO. Do you have anything for us to look at? I think comparison that show the following are of interest: throughput (e.g. netperf::TCP_STREAM): guest->host, guest->host->guest, guest->host->remote, host->remote, remote->host->guest latency (e.g. netperf::UDP_RR): same conditions as throughput cpu-utilization others? Ideally, this should be at least between upstream virtio and vhost. Bonus points if you include venet as well. Kind regards, -Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
