On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 07:50:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:06:48 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:01:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Also, we have a limitation that you can't have more descriptors than the ring > > > size, even with indirect, due to overzealous checks... > > > > Yes ... so I wonder: do we want to fix all this and add a feature bit, > > or wait until some guest actually wants to use such descriptors? > > Yes, we wait until someone wants it. Then (1) we have a test case, and > (2) we can make sure we don't do those (bogus, frankly) >= ringsize checks. OK. But for vhost, there's no reason not to do it right directly, right? guests won't depend on undefined behaviour. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
