Am Mittwoch 30 September 2009 19:13:21 schrieb Amit Shah: > - uses port->id instead of a static hvc_vtermno to pass on a value to > hvc_alloc(). Motivation explained within comments in the code. [...] > + * The first argument of hvc_alloc() is the virtual console > + * number. hvc_alloc() checks if a console with the same value > + * was used in hvc_instantiate(). We may not end up passing > + * the same value here (we use the value 0 in > + * hvc_instantiate() but the console port may not be at id > + * 0). This isn't a problem, though. Nothing in hvc really > + * depends on these numbers and since this number is passed on > + * to us when cons_get/put_chars() is called, it's preferable > + * to pass on the port->id so that we can get the port struct > + * via get_port_from_id(). [...] > + port->hvc = hvc_alloc(port->id, 0, &virtio_cons, PAGE_SIZE); I am not sure if this is going to be ok. When I change the old code (without your patch) to use vtermno=0 in hvc_instantiate and vtermno=1 in hvc_alloc I get "Warning: unable to open an initial console." It seems to me that we have to pass the same values. Christian _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
