On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:30:21 pm Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/20/2009 10:52 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:42:47 +0200 > > Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> If we were able to rip out all (or most) of paravirt from arch/x86 it > >> would be tempting for other technical reasons - but the patch above > >> is well localized. > >> > > interesting question is if this would allow us to remove a few of the > > paravirt hooks.... > > > > kvm will be removing the pvmmu support soon; and Xen is talking about > running paravirtualized guests in a vmx/svm container where they don't > need most of the hooks. When they're all gone, even I don't think lguest is sufficient excuse to keep CONFIG_PARAVIRT. Oh well. But that will probably be a while. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
