Hi Mike, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26 2009 at 7:32am -0400, > Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit > > will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux > > kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for > > the mini-summit and discuss about them. > > > > - Multiple IO controller development projects > > - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, > > Vivek's io-controller and dm-ioband. Do we have to pick one of > > them to put into the mainline? How to advance the development? > > This has been said by others before but: there is no reason the above > line of discussion can't happen on LKML et. al. (preferably now). > Deferring the discussion until Oct 17 guarantees that no solution would > be merged into 2.6.32. This would be quite unfortunate considering how > far Vivek's IO Controller has come. Aren't there also doubts about > whether the appropriate upstream people will be able to attend this > mini-summit? I don't mean to defer the discussion until the mini-summit. I would like to discuss about the above topic anytime in mailing lists and hear opinions from the upstream people. Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
