Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA - V4.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:12:26PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Alok Kataria wrote:
>> I see your point, but the ring logic or the ABI that we use to
>> communicate between the hypervisor and guest is not shared between our
>> storage and network drivers. As a result, I don't see any benefit of
>> separating out this ring handling mechanism, on the contrary it might
>> just add some overhead of translating between various layers for our
>> SCSI driver.
>>   
>
> But if you separate out the ring logic, it allows the scsi logic to be  
> shared by other paravirtual device drivers.  This is significant and  
> important from a Linux point of view.

As someone who has been hacking on a virtio scsi prototype I don't think
it's a good idea.  The vmware driver is a horrible design and I don't
think it should be merged.  Besides beeing a ugly driver and ABI we
really should not support this kind of closed protocol development.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux