Re: Extending virtio_console to support multiple ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (Tue) Aug 25 2009 [11:47:20], Amit Shah wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a
> transport for guest and host communications.
> 
> The code has been updated to reuse the virtio-console device instead
> of creating a new virtio-serial device.

And the problem now is that hvc calls the put_chars function with
spinlocks held and we now allocate pages in send_buf(), called from
put_chars.

A few solutions:
- Keep things as they are, virtio_console.c remains as it is and
  virtio_serial.c gets added

- Have separate write paths for console devices in virtio_console.c,
  which would beat the purpose of merging the two drivers and then
  they'd be better off standalone

- Convert hvc's usage of spinlocks to mutexes. I've no idea how this
  will play out; I'm no expert here. But I did try doing this and so far
  it all looks OK. No lockups, lockdep warnings, nothing. I have full
  debugging enabled. But this doesn't mean it's right.

Comments?

		Amit
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux