On Thursday 20 August 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > The errors from the socket (or chardev, as that was the > > start of the argument) should still fit into the categories > > that I mentioned, either they can be handled by the host > > kernel, or they are fatal. > > Hmm, are you sure? Imagine a device going away while socket is bound to > it. You get -ENXIO. It's not fatal in a sense that you can bind the > socket to another device and go on, right? Right. Not fatal in that sense, but fatal in the sense that I can no longer transmit other frames until you recover. I think we both meant the same here. Arnd <>< _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
