On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:40:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > If I understand it correctly, you can at least connect a veth pair > > > to a bridge, right? Something like > > > > > > veth0 - veth1 - vhost - guest 1 > > > eth0 - br0-| > > > veth2 - veth3 - vhost - guest 2 > > > > > Heh, you don't need a bridge in this picture: > > > > guest 1 - vhost - veth0 - veth1 - vhost guest 2 > > Sure, but the setup I described is the one that I would expect > to see in practice because it gives you external connectivity. > > Measuring two guests communicating over a veth pair is > interesting for finding the bottlenecks, but of little > practical relevance. > > Arnd <>< Oh, hopefully macvlan will soon allow that. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
