On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:25:29AM -0700, Matt Carlson wrote: > > As was said elsewhere, from the driver writer's perspective every packet > that has already been submitted (queued) to the hardware cannot be > preempted. Slightly extending that logic doesn't seem like that much of > a problem, especially if it saves the troublesome requeuing logic higher up. I think this is pretty much the same as returning TX_BUSY :) Do you have access to one of these buggy cards? Can you run some tests to see what the difference between TSO and GSO is on them? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
