On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:03 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/17/2009 11:33 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >> I particularly don't like the idea of arcane machine-dependent slot > >> allocation knowledge living in libvirt, because it needs to be in Qemu > >> anyway for non-libvirt users. No point in having two implementations > >> of something tricky and likely to have machine quirks, if one will do. > > > > Indeed. > > I don't understand this. Take note of the "arcane machine-dependent slot allocation knowledge" bit. If the algorithm in for management apps is as simple as "query qemu for available slots and sequentially allocate slots", then that's perfectly fine. If management apps need to hard-code which slots are available on different targets and different qemu versions, or restrictions on which devices can use which slots, or knowledge that some devices can be multi-function, or ... anything like that is just lame. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
