On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:11:42 pm Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 09:13 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > I think skb_orphan() is enough to prevent this, is it? > > Oops, I meant: > > I don't think skb_orphan() is enough to prevent this, is it? Yes, point taken. No, it's not. We could add nf_reset here too, which would be perfectly sane. I'm tempted to avoid the question marks hanging over generic skb_orphan for now, and just do skb_orphan & nf_reset at the head of our driver. Then look at making skb_orphan do nf_reset. It makes sense, but I'd have to audit all the callers. Thanks. Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
