On (Mon) Jun 01 2009 [11:43:27], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:05:10PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Mon) Jun 01 2009 [11:11:06], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 01:33:48PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > The recent find_vqs operation doesn't allow for a vq to be found at an > > > > arbitrary location; it's meant to be called once at startup to find all > > > > possible queues and never called again. > > > > > > > > This doesn't work for devices which can have queues hot-plugged at > > > > run-time. This can be made to work by passing the 'start_index' value as > > > > was done earlier for find_vq, but I doubt something like the following > > > > will work. The MSI vectors might need some changing as well. > > > > > > How, specifically? > > > > I'm not sure; I was wanting to know if they will. > > Yes, probably. > > > I suspect this piece > > of code though: > > > > in vp_find_vqs, just before calling vp_find_vq: > > > > /* How many vectors would we like? */ > > for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) > > if (callbacks[i]) > > ++vectors; > > > > err = vp_request_vectors(vdev, vectors); > > if (err) > > goto error_request; > > > > Will any adjusting be needed for the 'vectors' argument (since it's > > considered to be the max value one can specify)? > > > > Amit > > Right. And it can only be called once. And something'll have to be done > on cleanup as well. Yes; that's the assumption find_vqs currently makes. I'll take a stab at reworking this code. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
