> >> The PCI bus doesn't need any special support (I think) but something on > >> the other end needs to interpret those writes. > > > > Sure. But there's definitely nothing PCI specific about it. I assumed > > this would all be contained within the APIC. > > MSIs are defined by PCI and their configuration is done using the PCI > configuration space. A MSI is just a regular memory write, and the PCI spec explicitly states that a target (e.g. the APIC) is unable to distinguish between a MSI and any other write. The PCI config bits just provide a way of telling the device where/what to write. > >> In any case we need some internal API for this, and qemu_irq looks like > >> a good choice. > > > > What do you expect to be using this API? > > virtio, emulated devices capable of supporting MSI (e1000?), device > assignment (not yet in qemu.git). It probably makes sense to have common infrastructure in pci.c to expose/implement device side MSI functionality. However I see no need for a direct API between the device and the APIC. We already have an API for memory accesses and MMIO regions. I'm pretty sure a system could implement MSI by pointing the device at system ram, and having the CPU periodically poll that. Paul _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
