On Sun, 10 May 2009 04:55:38 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:37:06PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Yes, and in fact a rough look at your patch reveals that we don't > > actually need del_vq: now we track them, we can just do that as part of > > vdev destruction, right? > > Let's assume that a driver encounters an error in probe > after it calls find_vq. It would need a way to revert > find_vq, won't it? > > It seems to me that bus->remove does not get called > on probe failure. Isn't that right? Yep, I looked too fast. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
