Am Thursday 16 April 2009 13:08:18 schrieb Herbert Xu:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:38:34PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > So how about this? We replace the dev destructor with our own that
> > doesn't immediately call free_netdev. We only call free_netdev once
> > all tun fd's attached to the device have been closed.
>
> Here's the patch. I'd appreciate if everyone can review it
> and see if they can recreate the original race by
>
> 1) Starting a process using tun and polls on it;
> 2) Doing ip tun del tunXXX while the process is polling.
>
> tun: Only free a netdev when all tun descriptors are closed
>
> The commit c70f182940f988448f3c12a209d18b1edc276e33 ("tun: Fix
> races between tun_net_close and free_netdev") fixed a race where
> an asynchronous deletion of a tun device can hose a poll(2) on
> a tun fd attached to that device.
Sorry for the late reply, but this patch creates another regression:
Now TUNSETIFF returns EBUSY on a persistent tap device:
open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR) = 11
ioctl(11, 0x400454ca, 0x3ffff8e2270) = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy)
Some debugging (thanks to Carsten Otte) showed that
tun_set_iff calls tun_attach (the first call inside the if(dev)). tun_attach
now checks for tun->tfile but this is already set.
Looks like we need another fix on top :-(
Christian
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
