On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 22:32:00 +1100 > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I still think this needs much more justification. > > Ok, I can understand that. We probably need a KVM based version to show > that benefits exist on non-s390 hardware as well. That would indeed help your cause enormously (I think I made the same point last time). All these complex transitions, added to benefit only an architecture to which few developers have access, asks for trouble - we mm hackers already get caught out often enough by your too-well-camouflaged page_test_dirty(). Hugh _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
