* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@xxxxxxx) wrote: > Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought the breakage might be introduced > between 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 and > 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, so I thought it would be a good > idea to verify if 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f fails too. Ah, sure. It fails too (both test_suspend=mem and regular suspend/resume). _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
