Yinghai Lu wrote:
...
>> Or am I missing your point?
>
> static void init_copy_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *old_desc,
> struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> {
> memcpy(desc, old_desc, sizeof(struct irq_desc));
>
>
> will overwrite new_desc->affinity and pending_mask
>
> YH
Yup, apparently I was missing your point (banging on head once more).
Thanks for spotting this!
Ingo - what's the state of tip/cpus4096? Shall I push this as an
append patch, or redo the original so bisectability works.
Also, Yinghai - would you know of a straight forward way to test
the irq migration? I have taken cpus offline and back online
but wasn't sure if any irq's were being moved off of cpu 0 which
cannot be taken offline.
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
