On Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:51 am Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:42:54AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > I really don't want the SR-IOV stuff to sit out another merge cycle > > though... Arg. > > Why, is there some rush to get it in? As there is no in-kernel users of > it, I don't see the problem with postponing it until someone actually > needs it. Well it *does* make development of SR-IOV drivers that much harder. As you know, out of tree development is a pain. OTOH if any changes end up being required, they can be done before the code is merged. Anyway, hopefully we won't have to worry about it because some driver will come along soon that uses Yu's code. :) If not, Yu might have to maintain a separate git tree or something until the drivers are ready to be merged. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
