On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:53PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I applied 1-9 to my linux-next branch; and at least patch #10 needs a respin, I still object to #2. We should have the flexibility to have 'struct resource's that are not in this array in the pci_dev. I would like to see the SR-IOV resources _not_ in this array (and indeed, I'd like to see PCI bridges keep their producer resources somewhere other than in this array). I accept that there are still some problems with this, but patch #2 moves us further from being able to achieve this goal, not closer. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
