Hi, Peter. > Just wondering,.. have you lot looked at the recently posted BFQ > patches? > > BFQ looks like a very promising elevator, its has tighter bounds than > CFQ and already does the cgroup thing. This patchset is improved our previous scheduler(sent 04/01/2008) and resolves some problems. And, we scheduler can control at the two layers. Namely, it can control I/O among groups and I/O among tasks within a group. I always check in containers ML mainly. So, I found I/O control patches in it ML, dm-iobnd, io-throttle, Naveen's Anticipatory I/O scheduler, Vasily's CFQ scheduler and Vivek's Another IO controller. And today I know the BFQ scheduler, so I'm not looked at the BFQ yet. Now, I'm looking its patch. Thanks, comments. Satoshi UCHIDA > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 5:58 PM > To: Satoshi UCHIDA > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Ryo > Tsuruta'; 'Andrea Righi'; ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx; fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > vtaras@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Hirokazu Takahashi'; balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > 'Andrew Morton'; menage@xxxxxxxxxx; SUGAWARA Tomoyoshi; > paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx; Fabio Checconi > Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][12+2][v3] A expanded CFQ scheduler for cgroups > > Hi, > > Just wondering,.. have you lot looked at the recently posted BFQ > patches? > > BFQ looks like a very promising elevator, its has tighter bounds than > CFQ and already does the cgroup thing. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 5:58 PM > To: Satoshi UCHIDA > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Ryo > Tsuruta'; 'Andrea Righi'; ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx; fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > vtaras@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Hirokazu Takahashi'; balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > 'Andrew Morton'; menage@xxxxxxxxxx; SUGAWARA Tomoyoshi; > paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx; Fabio Checconi > Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][12+2][v3] A expanded CFQ scheduler for cgroups > > Hi, > > Just wondering,.. have you lot looked at the recently posted BFQ > patches? > > BFQ looks like a very promising elevator, its has tighter bounds than > CFQ and already does the cgroup thing. > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
