On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:36:50AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If you are not already tired of so many io controller implementations, here > > is another one. > > > > This is a very eary very crude implementation to get early feedback to see > > if this approach makes any sense or not. > > > > This controller is a proportional weight IO controller primarily > > based on/inspired by dm-ioband. One of the things I personally found little > > odd about dm-ioband was need of a dm-ioband device for every device we want > > to control. I thought that probably we can make this control per request > > queue and get rid of device mapper driver. This should make configuration > > aspect easy. > > > > I have picked up quite some amount of code from dm-ioband especially for > > biocgroup implementation. > > > > I have done very basic testing and that is running 2-3 dd commands in different > > cgroups on x86_64. Wanted to throw out the code early to get some feedback. > > > > More details about the design and how to are in documentation patch. > > > > Your comments are welcome. > > Which kernel version is this patch set based on? > 2.6.27 Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
