Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:47:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>   
>> I don't think we really know what the One True Usage model is for VF
>> devices.  Chris Wright has some ideas, I have some ideas and Yu Zhao has
>> some ideas.  I bet there's other people who have other ideas too.
>>     
>
> I'd love to hear those ideas.
>   

We've been talking about avoiding hardware passthrough entirely and just 
backing a virtio-net backend driver by a dedicated VF in the host.  That 
avoids a huge amount of guest-facing complexity, let's migration Just 
Work, and should give the same level of performance.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Rumor has it, there is some Xen code floating around to support this
> already, is that true?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>   

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux