Re: [PATCH 0/2] dm-ioband: I/O bandwidth controller v1.8.0: Introduction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Haotian,

> The results are almost the same. I can not see any change of Direct I/O
> performance for this bio-cgroup kernel feature with dm-ioband support!
> 
> Does the methord to caculate throughout should be the Rate of xdd.linux
> output? 
> Dose my testing approach should be correct? If not, please help me point
> out.

Could you try to run the xdd programs simultaneously?
dm-ioband controls bandwidth while I/O requests are issued
simultaneously from processes which belong to different cgroup.
If I/O requests are only issued from processes which belong to one
cgroup, the processes can use the whole bandwidth.

The following URL is an example of how bandwidth is shared to I/O
load change.
http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/benchmark/partition1.html

Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux